The Dilemma of Preservation or Change? In a Search for a Solution for the Survival of the Social Landscape of the Historical Texture in Semnan and Damghan Cities

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D Candidate in Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran.

2 M.A. Student in Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

3 M.A. Student in Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

4 M.A. Student in Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture & Urbanism, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The social landscape is created by collective life and shared interactions between the people themselves and their environment. The historical texture of the cities narrates the city’s identity and depicts its history, and the preservation of their social landscape is greatly important. Adoption of a suitable approach in terms of the social landscape in the historical texture of the cities depends on the creation of a balance between the preservation of the valuable works of the past in the environment and harmony between their different physical, semantic, and functional aspects and the needs of the citizens and contemporary urban society. Preservation of the social landscapes in the historical texture of cities such as Semnan and Damghan is faced with some challenges. Urban management has moved towards a protective and demonstrative approach, with some prioritization of the physical environment. In contrast, in some other cases, it has physically and functionally equipped the environment to allocate the space to contemporary society without sufficient understanding of the meaning of the space, context, and audience needs. The current article aimed to investigate the different aspects of the social landscape and how they evolved in the historical texture of Semnan and Damghan cities in a way that, through considering the effects of different factors, it would be possible to adopt a suitable approach to preserve such landscapes in the context of today’s urban life. The social landscape is a general and synergistic phenomenon of function, body, and meaning, and paying attention to the key role of people to preserve it over time is very important. A unilateral and environment improvement-oriented approach without considering the social and cultural aspects, the instability of social composition would lead to a drop in public participation and commitment and a decline in the social landscape. The necessity to pay attention to the basic prerequisites such as the validation of capabilities, the intrinsic meaning and inclusive nature of each space, the needs of the contemporary society, the supportive factors of individuals' presence, and the key role of people, allows for the realization of the social landscape as the product of the dynamic experience of the environment by the society and the collective asset with widespread ownership. Some forms of active protection and collective management through restoring the relationship with the places positively impact the survival of the social landscape. Planning a holistic, integrated, and multi-dimensional process to increase the citizens’ attachment to the place and observance of a balance between the preservation and manipulation of the landscape also help with the survival of the social landscape and continuous updating of the users’ relationship with the landscape and interpretation of it.

Keywords


  • Abarghouei Fard, H. (2021). Ritual Landscape from the Perspective of Tourism. Tourism of Culture, 1(3), 43-50.
  • Abarghouei fard, H., Boroumand, H., Tayefeh Hosseinlou, A., Latifi, S., Nabaei, S. & Nickzad, G. (2020). Collective Space, a Declining Concept Assessing the Social Quality of Urban Spaces in the Historic District of Gorgan. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 8(28), 23-32.
  • Abarghouei Fard, H. & Mansouri, S. (2021). Reviewing the Constituent Components of the Spatial Organization of Iranian City after Islam in the 9th–14th AH Travelogues. MANZAR, 13(55), 20-29.
  • Abarghouei Fard, H. & Saboonchi, P. (2020). Landscape as Symbolic Nature; Contemplation of the Representative Role of Natural Elements in the Formation of the Landscape of Kamu Village. MANZAR, 12(52), 28-37.
  • Abarghouei Fard, H., Saboonchi, P. & Farzin, A. (2018). An Investigation into the Role of Ritual Landscapes in the Identity of Iranian Cities.  Bagh-e Nazar, 15(65), 5-12.
  • Alehashemi, A. (2020). Integration between traditional water infrastructures and the residential quarter systems in the Iranian cities urban structures and water infrastructure in Semnan. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 8(27), 5-14.
  • Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and urban planning70(1-2), 21-34.
  • Atashinbar, M. (2009). The Continuity of Identity in Urban Landscape. Bagh-e Nazar, 6(12), 45-56.
  • Bandari, A. (2022). Sara-ye Naqsh’e Jahan [Naqsh-e Jahan Sara]. Retrieved June 28, 2022. from  https://www.irna.ir/photo/84035543/
  • Berque, A. (2013). Thinking through Landscape (A. M Feenberg-Dibon Trans.). London: Routledge.
  • Cosgrove, D. E. (1984). Social formation and symbolic landscape. London; Sydney: Croom Helm.
  • Cosgrove, D. & Daniels, S. (Eds.). (1988). The iconography of landscape: essays on the symbolic representation, design and use of past environments (Vol. 9). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cosgrove, D. E. (1992). Water, Engineering and Land-Scape: Water Control and Landscape in the Modern Period. New Delhi: CBS Publishers.
  • Cosgrove, D. E. (2006). Modernity, community and the landscape idea. Journal of material culture11(1-2), 49-66.
  • Cosgrove, D. (2010). Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. In R. DeLue & J. Elkins (Eds.). Landscape theory (Vol. 6). London: Routledge.
  • Curzon. G. (1970). Persia and the Persia Question. Vol. 2 (Gh. Vahid Mazandarani, Trans.). Tehran: Elmifarhangi.
  • Delue. R. (2015). Is landscape theory? In G. Doherty. & C. Waldheim. (Eds.). Is landscape...?: Essays on the identity of landscape. London: Routledge.
  • Falamaki, M. M. (1989). Iranian city in a comparative Comparison with global experience. Tehran: Faza Publication.
  • Ghazanfari, S. & Karimi, M. (2016). Cheshme Ali in Damghan and reasons for its sacredness.  Bagh-e Nazar, 13(42), 57-66.
  • Habibi Bastami, H. (2019). Ghadam zadan ba ab dar tarikh [Walking on water in history]. Retrieved June 26, 2022. From https://www.isna.ir/news/98100805402/
  • Haqiqat, A. (1983).Tarikh’e Qoumes [History of Qumis]. Tehran: Kian publication.
  • Harris, D. (2010). Self and Landscape. In R. DeLue. & J. Elkins (Eds.). Landscape theory (Vol. 6). London: Routledge.
  • Hasanabadi, N. (2021). Zeval ya ehya? [decline or revival?]. Retrieved June 25, 2022. From https://www.yjc.news/fa/news/8023356/
  • Hemmati, M., Mansouri, S., Barati, N. (2022). Media as a Tool to Transform the Urban Landscape Developing a Conceptual Model to Influence the Urban Landscape with No Physical Intervention. MANZAR, 14(58), 66-77.
  • Hunziker, M., Felber, P., Gehring, K., Buchecker, M., Bauer, N. & Kienast, F. (2008). Evaluation of Landscape Change by Different Social Groups. Mountain Research and Development, 28(2), 140–147. 
  • Jahanaray, A. (2021). Rang-e Zendegi dar baft-e tarikhi-ye Semnan [The color of life in the historical context of Semnan]. Retrieved June 25, 2022. From https://www.hamshahrionline.ir/news/629893/
  • Khoramrouei, R., Pahlavan, P., Zarif Asgar, E., Sabouri, S., Daneshi, P. & Sadafi Kohneh, P. (2020). Gorgan City: Heritage and Ritual Landscapes. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 8(28), 13-22.
  • Khorramrouei, R. & Mahan, A. (2021). Reviewing the Role of ‘Ritual Landscape’ in Tourism Development Case Study: Imāmzādeh Mohsen in City of Hamadan, Iran. Tourism of Culture, 2(4), 13-20.
  • khorramrouei, R., Mahan, A. & Farzin, A. (2019). Explaining the ritualistic concept and studying its crystallization effects. Hoviatshahr, 13(2), 51-62.
  • Lewis, P. (1979). Axioms for Reading the Landscape. In D. W. Meinig (Ed.). The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes (pp. 11–32). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Lindström, K., Palang, H. & Kull, K. (2013). Semiotics of landscape. In P. Howard, I. Thompson, E. Waterton & M. Atha (Eds.). The Routledge companion to landscape studies. London: Routledge.
  • Majidi, M., Mansouri, S., Sabernejad, J., Barati, N. (2019). The Role of Landscape Approach in Improving Satisfaction with the Urban Environment. Bagh-e Nazar, 16(76), 45-56.
  • Majidi, M., Mansouri, S., Saber Nejad, J., Barati, N. (2021). Landscape Capacities in Realizing the Concept of Participation in Urban Projects. MANZAR, 13(54), 18-27.
  • Malpas, J. (Ed.). (2011). The Place of Landscape: Concepts, Contexts, Studies. The MIT Press.
  • Mansouri, M. (2016). The role of nature in aestheticizing interventions in Tehran through the lens of “Valuation Theory”. MANZAR, 8(35), 66-73.
  • Mansouri, S. (2010). Urban Landscape: The control of the qualitative measures with quantitative components. MANZAR, 2(11), 6-7.
  • Mansouri, S. (2018). The Folk Visage of the City. MANZAR, 10(44), 3-3.
  • Mirshokraei, M. (2003). Ensan va ab dar Iran [Human and water in Iran]. Ketab-e Mah-e Honar (57-58).
  • Mohaqeq, M. (2021). “Nezam-e sonata taqsim ab” Semnan dar entezar jahani shodan [Semnan's "traditional water distribution system" is waiting for globalization.]. Retrieved June 28, 2022. From https://www.isna.ir/photo/1400071912982.
  • Mokhles, F., Farzin, A. & Javadi, S. (2013). Pir-e Morad Shrine, the Cultural-Religious Perspective of Baneh City.  Bagh-e Nazar, 10(24), 27-38.
  • Mousavi, A. (1989). Tarikh-e Shahr-e Damghan [The History of Damghan City]. In: I. Jafarpour (ed.), Les architectures et la ville de Damghan. Tehran: Faza Publication.
  • Olwig, K. (2003). Landscape: The Lowenthal legacy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers93(4), 871-877.
  • Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.
  • Saboonchi, P. & Abarghouei Fard, H. (2020). Environmental Wisdom, Indigenous Knowledge and the Role of Ecological Factors in Planning and the Construction of Kamu Village, Iran. MANZAR, 12(53), 18-25.
  • Scannell, L. & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1-10.
  • Schatzki, T, R. (2011). Landscapes as Temporalspatial Phenomena. In J. Malpas (Ed.). The Place of Landscape: Concepts, Contexts, Studies. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Schein, R. H. (1997). The place of landscape: A conceptual framework for interpreting an American scene. Annals of the Association of American Geographers87(4), 660-680.
  • Swaffield, S. R. (2006). Theory and critique in landscape architecture: Making connections. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 1(1), 22-29.
  • Teimouri, M. (2010). Trah-e manzar-e shahri-ye mahalleh, rahkar-e tadavom-e hoviat dar ravand-e nosazi [Urban landscape design of the neighborhood, a solution for continuity of identity in the process of renovation]. MANZAR, 2(10), 51-54.
  • Teimouri, M. (2014). Experiences of Contemporary Renovation from the perspective of Urban Identity. MANZAR, 6(27), 44-49.
  • Tilley, C. (2006). Introduction: Identity, place, landscape and heritage. Journal of material culture11(1-2), 7-32.
  • Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.