Perceptions of the Meanings and Meaning-Making Factors of Yazd Traditional Houses Based on the Approach of Cultural Semiotics

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. student, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tehran West Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Professor, Theater Department, Faculty of Arts, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract| As the first place in the formation of human experience aspects, the house can be the basis of the thought and culture of society. These aspects of identity in the semantic system of architectural texts in traditional Iranian houses are beyond what is visible. This meaning can be found through reading, perception, contemplation, and exploration of the underlying and hidden layers of these houses.
This study is based on the approach of cultural semiotics, trying to understand the structure of traditional buildings by relying on the method of cultural semiotics and discovering the hidden cultures and traditions in these houses by understanding symbolic concepts.
The study is trying to answer these main questions: How are meanings formed in traditional houses of Yazd and what factors lead to the formation of the meanings?
This study uses the descriptive-analytical method and is based on the cultural semiotics approach proposed by Yuri Lotman and Roland Posner. In this regard, the association or differences and conflicts between symbolic systems in the context of traditional houses in Yazd were first examined. Its previous interpretations were then reviewed, and its symbolic transformations were explained using Lotman’s cultural semiotics approach.
The results suggest that the meanings in traditional houses are defined as an entrance complex and the central courtyard and are repeated as multiple texts with the correlation of all the indicators. These similarities in symbolic systems are intertwined in the whole and components, which are based on the relationship between object and context, unity and plurality homomorphism, boundedness, and interaction, and developed in the framework of the semiosphere of Yazd’s cultural space.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • Bagheri, S. & Einifar, A. R. (2016). Scrutiny and limitation of the scope of signs in architecture. Armanshahr, 95 (17), 1-10.

    • Behzadfar, M. & Noormohammadzadeh, H. (2012). Histology of historical body tissue of Yazd city with systemic approach. Urban Management, 10 (29), 23-47.
    • Cooper,C.R., Kelly, L. & Winters, E. (2000). Philosophical and psychological bases of space understanding (A. Arbab Jolfaei, Trans.). Isfahan: Khak Publishing [In Persian].

    Dabbagh, A. M. & Mokhtabad, S. M. (2011). Interpretation of postmodern architecture from the perspective of semiotics. Hoviatshahr, 55 (73), 59-72.

    Dibaj, S. M. (2003). Our Poetry and Home: A Research in Persian Architecture and Literature. Tehran: Payvand No Publishing.

    Etemadipour, M. & Mahdinejad, J. (2021). The modeling of ideation process in architectural design instruction by semiotic approach (Case study: Residential design). Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU), 12 (1),23-35 [In Persian].

    Giraud, P. (2001). Semiology (M. Nabavi, Trans.). Tehran: Agha Publications [In Persian].

    Lang, J. (2007). Creation of architectural theory, the role of behavioral sciences in perception of environment, translation, objective fare, AS. Tehran: Tehran University Press.

    Lorusso, A. M. (2019). Cultural Semiotics (H. Sarfraz, Trans.). Tehran: Elmi O Farhangi Publications.

    Lotman, Y. (1977). The Structure of the Artistic Text (R. Vroon, Trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. [In Persian]

    Lotman, Y. & Uspensky, B. (1978). On the Semiotic Mechanism of Culture. New Literary History, 9 (2).

    Nojoumian, A. A. (2011). Cultural Semiotics: Collected Essays. Tehran: Sokhan Publications [In Persian].

    Nojoumian, A. A. (2016). Signs at the Threshold: Essays in Semiotics. Tehran: Nashr-e No Publications .

    Sholtz, C. N. (2002). The concept of dwelling: on the way to figurative architecture (M. A. Yarahmadi, Trans.). Tehran: Agah Publications.

    Panahi, S. (2018). Architecture and Spiritual Cinema. Tehran: Asr-e Kankash Publications.

    Rasetgar Zhaleh, S. (2022). Analysis of the Impact of Culture on Baluch Housing through the Semiosphere of Iurii Lotman. Architecture in Hot and Dry Climate, 10 (15), 33-49 [In Persian].

    Sarfaraz, H., Pakatchi, A., Kosari, M. & Ashna, H. (2017). Analysis of Yuri Lotman’s symbolic sphere cultural theory. Journal of Strategic Studies in Culture (JSFC),10 (39), 73-96.

    Semenenko, A. (2017). The Texture of Culture: An Introduction to Yuri Lotman’s Semiotic Theory (H. Sarfaraz, Trans.). Tehran: Elmi O Farhangi Publications.

    Shairi, H. R. (2018). Visual Semantics. Tehran: Sokhan.

    Sojoudi, F. (2021). Cultural semiotics. Tehran: Elm .

    Tullay, S. (2007). Tourism Review. Esfahan: Tarbiat Moallem University Press.

    White, E. (2006). Basic Concepts in Architecture (M. Ahmadinejad, Trans.). Esfahan: Khak..

Tourism of Culture
Volume 4, Issue 14
November 2023
Pages 6-17

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 June 2023
  • Revise Date: 05 September 2023
  • Accept Date: 11 September 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics