Development Of Quality Promotion Indicators For Maharlu Lake Tourism Based On A Biophilic Model Aligned with City Structure

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. student, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, azvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.

Abstract

The biophilic approach, a subset of sustainability, is considered the most comprehensive approach to nature; also, the components affecting the biophilic model in Maharlu Lake tourism are access to water zones, leisure time spent in green spaces, and per capita green spaces, which can contribute to the biophilic model development. 
This study investigated the indicators of biophilic urban development to promote the quality of life. This study is applied in terms of purpose and falls under descriptive-analytical and exploratory research in terms of nature. To gather data, we used documentary and survey methods. The data was collected through a researcher-made questionnaire, interviews, and in-depth observation. The sample of this study consisted of tourists visiting Maharlu Lake, ordinary people, and experts.The most effective components affecting the biophilic model of Maharlu lake tourism were access to water zones, leisure time spent in green spaces, and per capita green spaces, respectively. Of all dimensions affecting development, structural, managerial, and social-cultural dimensions had the most effect on the biophilic model of Maharlu lake tourism.

Keywords


  • Beatley, T. (2017). Biophilic cities and healthy societies. Urban Planning, 2(4), 1-4.

    Bitaraf, E. & Zabihi, H. (1396). Biophilic attitude toward improving the quality of the living environment of residential residences. Urban and Rural Management, (49), 349-331.

    Cabanek, A., & Newman, P. (2017). Biophilic urban regeneration: can biophilics be a land value capture mechanism?. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. Sustainable Development and Planning; Brebbia, CA, Zubir, SS, Hassan, AS, Eds, 65-78.

    Ebrahimpour, M., Majedi, H. & Zabihi, H. (2017). “Biophilic” planning, a new approach in achieving liveable cities in Iranian new towns–Hashtgerd case study. Town and Regional Planning, (70), 1-13.

    Ede, J., & Morley, A. (2020). Review of transport for London’s ‘Healthy Streets Approach’and its potential contribution to biophilic. Cities & Health, (18), 23-25.

    Herzog, T. R. & Bryce, A. G. (2007). Mystery and preference in within-forest settings. Environment and Behavior, 39(6), 779-796.

    • Ignatieva, M., Golosova, E., Melnichuk, I. & Smertin, V. (2018). Development of biophilic cities in Russia: from ideal scientific town and Ecopolis to the green strategy of the modern megapolis. In 55th IFLA World Congress. Case of Sinpa, Altınoran, Ankara / Turkey.

    Izadi, H., Farrokh Shad, F. & Hassan Shahi, Gh. (2018). Biophilic city, a new approach in achieving a healthy city and connection with nature. The 4th International Congress of Agricultural Development, Natural Resources, Environment and Tourism of Iran. Tabriz.

    Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (2008). Biophilia. Michigan: Grand Valley State University in Allendale.

    Levine, N. (2016). The urbanism of frank Lloyd Wright. Princeton University Press.

    Mavadat, E. & Valipour, A. D. (2019). Investigation and design of biophilic city inspired by urban river, a case study of Dezful city. Geography and Environmental Studies, 9(34), 42-23.

    McDonald, R., & Beatley, T. (2021). Biophilic Cities for an Urban Century: Why nature is essential for the success of cities. Springer international publishing-palgrave pivot.

    Newman, P. (2013). Biophilic urbanism: a case study on Singapore. Australian Planner, 51(1), 47– 65.

    Pedersen Zari, M. (2019). Understanding and designing nature experiences in cities: A framework for biophilic urbanism. Cities & Health, (13), 1-12.

    • Scott, M., Lennon, M., Haase, D., Kazmierczak, A., Clabby, G., & Beatley, T. (2016). Nature-based solutions for the contemporary city/Re-naturing the city/Reflections on urban landscapes, ecosystems services and nature-based solutions in cities/Multifunctional green infrastructure and climate change adaptation: brownfield greening as an adaptation strategy for vulnerable communities?/Delivering green infrastructure through planning: insights from practice in Fingal, Ireland/Planning for biophilic cities: from theory to practice.Planning Theory & Practice, 17(2), 267-300.

    Terkenli, T. S., Bell, S., Toškovic, O., Dubljevic-Tomicevic, J., Panagopoulos, T., Straupe, I., Kristianova, K., Straigyte, L., O’Brien, L., & Živojinovic, I. (2020). Tourist perceptions and uses of urban green infrastructure: An exploratory cross-cultural investigation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, (49), 126624.

    Terkenli, T., Bell, S., Živojinovic, I., Tomicevic-Dubljevic, J., Panagopoulos, T., Straupe, I., Toskovic, O., Kristianova, K., Stragyte, L., & O’Brien, L. (2017). Recreational Use of Urban Green Infrastructure: The Tourist’s Perspective. In D. Pearlmutter, C. Calfapietra, R. Samson, L. O’Brien, S. Krajter Ostoic, G. Sanesi, & R. Alonso del Amo (Eds.), The Urban Forest Cultivating Green Infrastructure for People and the Environment. Springer-Verlag.

    Totaforti, S. (2020). Emerging Biophilic Urbanism: The Value of the Human–Nature Relationship in the Urban Space. Sustainability, 12(5487), 1-16.

    Xue, F., Gou, Z., Lau, S. S. Y., Lau, S. K., Chung, K. H., Zhang, J. (2019). From biophilic design to biophilic urbanism: Stakeholders’ perspectives. Cleaner Production, (211), 1444-1452.

    Young, R. F. (2016). The biophilic city and the quest for paradise. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 5(1). 1-22.

    Yousefi, A. & Jafari Khodavardi, N. (2016). Biophilic architecture and sustainable development. Tehran: Simai Danesh Publications.

    Ziari, K., Pourahmad, A., Fotouhi Mehrabani, B., & Hosseini, A. (2018). Environmental sustainability in cities by biophilic city approach: a case study of Tehran. International Journal of Urban Sciences,  22(4), 486-516.